This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 1588–1595, doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.154
Figure 1: Schematic view of the impact simulation setup. (a) Top: side view and bottom: top view. The red reg...
Figure 2: Energy change as a function of the time for an α-GY nanosheet under an impact velocity of 2 km/s. ∆E...
Figure 3: Impact deformation of α-GY under an impact velocity of 2 km/s. (a) von Mises atomic stress distribu...
Figure 4: Impact deformation of different GYs under an impact velocity of 2 km/s. (a, b) Atomic configuration...
Figure 5: Cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the von Mises atomic stress distribution before crack ini...
Figure 6: Number of breaking bonds in GY and graphene nanosheets under different impact velocity amplitudes.
Figure 7: Specific penetration energy as a function of the impact velocity for GY and graphene nanosheets.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 717–725, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.84
Figure 1: (a) A perfect GNR with 3% B-dopant. (b) A perfect GNR with 1.5% B- and 1.5% N-dopant. (c) Velocity ...
Figure 2: (a) Variation in time of the external energy obtained from a perfect GNR. (b) The corresponding fre...
Figure 3: Variation of history of the external energy over time for a perfect GNR with B-dopant densities of ...
Figure 4: Variation of the external energy over time for a perfect GNR with B- and N-dopants. The total densi...
Figure 5: (a) Variation of the external energy over time obtained for a pristine GNR with two vacancies. The ...
Figure 6: Variation of the external energy over time for a defective GNR (two vacancies) with B-dopant. The d...
Figure 7: Variation of the external energy over time for the defective GNR (two vacancies) with both B- and N...
Figure 8: (a) Time history of the external energy obtained from pristine defective GNR with four vacancies. T...
Figure 9: Variation over time of the external energy of the defective GNR with four vacancies and B-dopant de...
Figure 10: Variation over time of the external energy for the defective GNR (four vacancies) with both B- and ...
Figure 11: Results of the defective GNR (four vacancies) with 1.20% B- and 1.20% N-dopant. (a) Variation over ...
Figure 12: (a) Comparisons of the relative natural frequency among all studied samples. (b) Comparisons of the...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 329–336, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.37
Figure 1: Schematic view of the model GNHS-2.0%N2.0%B. Inset ‘A’ shows the boron and nitrogen atoms located a...
Figure 2: Simulation results for pristine GNHS: (a) Stress–strain curve; atomic configurations at the strain ...
Figure 3: Stress–strain curves of GNHS with different percentage of N-dopants between 1% and 4%.
Figure 4: Atomic configurations of GNHS-2%N at a strain of: (a) 0.097; (b) 0.098; (c) 0.099, inset highlights...
Figure 5: Stress–strain curves of GNHS with different percentage of B-dopant ranging from 0.5% to 4%.
Figure 6: Atomic configurations of GNHS-2.5%B at the strain of: (a) 0.094; (b) 0.102; (c) 0.103, inset reveal...
Figure 7: Stress–strain curves of GNHS with different densities of B- and N-dopant.
Figure 8: Atomic configurations of GNHS-0.75%N0.75%B at the strain of: (a) 0.097; (b) 0.101 (c) 0.102; (d) 0....
Figure 9: Yield strain, YP, and Young’s modulus, E, as a function of the concentration of N-, B-, and NB-dopa...